Page 4 of 4
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:24 am
by ofonorow
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:14 pm
by Johnwen
It appears from this study that Pauling had a clue about how cells were damaged by oxidative stress leading to further progression to a worst case outcome. Here is a study that shows women who have low A,C,E intake are at greater risk of breast cancer. I haven't heard anything from the "PINK" crowd about this!!!!!
Why did I post it here?
Read it and find out why!!
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2727686/
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2015 7:43 am
by ofonorow
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 1:04 pm
by ofonorow
If you wake up Thursday and there is a new forum, "Telomerase Activation Medicine" that means the Wednesday was a good day and a conference call went well...
In the meantime, and (I may post this separately), any budding chemists out there willing to exercise their ability and help determine whether this TA-65 patent http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2008/0113925.html describes or matches the astralagus root extract cycloastragenol?
Want to remember this blog about "pure cycloastragenol now available" for future reference,.
http://www.longecity.org/forum/topic/31987-pure-cycloastragenol-is-now-available/
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:14 am
by Johnwen
RevGenetics openly admits it is as you can see here!
First their web site and then their statement with Lab analysis which is avaiable on their website.
http://cycloastragenol.com/http://cycloastragenol.com/TA-65-is-Cycloastragolx.pdf
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 10:22 am
by ofonorow
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2015 12:10 pm
by Johnwen
Re: Telomere Timebomb
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:23 am
by ofonorow