Re: Is Corona just the cover story
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2022 10:38 pm
ofonorow wrote:What else, here is my challenge to Saw, read Judy MikoVitz's PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION and then tell me with a straight face there are no such things as viruses or retroviruses.
Saw wrote:I think it's a mostly a matter of perspective replace "virus" with "poison" when she talks
and she starts to sound somewhat coherant. It's all falling apart and she knows it.
ofonorow wrote:your (sounds uneducated) opinion.
pamojja wrote:The proof of existence of viruses or its lack is just too inconsquental for an agnostic. Since to know how to fight virus or poison associated illnesses is all which counts at the end of the day.
Saw wrote:For me I agree entirely, but the willfully ignorant masses will take us down with them.
Also it's not just the validity of the virus theory. Even if viruses did exist as described the entire virology/vaccine complex has proven itself a joke and could never be trusted again.
Saw wrote:ofonorow wrote:your (sounds uneducated) opinion.
That's a very powerful rebuttal.
Reminds me of the response I received from Dr.Fleming.
I sent him the control studies from Lanka showing CPE (cytopathic effect - the "proof" viruses replicate) occurs
with or without a sick persons fluid sample added to the experiment.
His reply was - "Viruses exist, god bless you"
Simply Brilliant, I was in awe.
Then I request he post a link to evidence of his claim. - No response (so surprised).
Surely one virus believer could post one convincing argument at this point. I mean, there's an entire massive mountain of evidence to choose from!
.
ofonorow wrote:
First of all, shooting the messenger (Judy Mikovitz) is not an argument. She's a lab technician, not even a medical doctor.
The arguments against viruses are phony.
Lets assume that what we call viruses are "poisons" - are they alive?
Do these poisons multiply? How are these poisons transmitted from person to person? Are they smaller than bacteria? Can poisons be killed by ultraviolet light? Can poisons sit dormant in tissue until something triggers it to become active - and multiply? (Herpes after chicken pox). Soon the difference between your poisons and what are called viruses (that use parts of our RNA/DNA to multiply and spread) become indistinguishable.
They aren't poisons, they are cellular debris and maybe cellular building blocks and they do not appear to be alive.
The items they claim as viruses in their CPE experiments are broken down cells.
Those like Judy that believe they are injecting viruses into people is because they can see the CPE (cytopathic effect) and
assume them viruses. Starving Cells will produce the same effect.
No one is claiming viruses are poison. Poison kills cells, they break down into the particles what they think are viruses.
Why? because that's what they've been trained to believe.
ofonorow wrote:
So your argument is more that "something" kills a cell, and that the remnants are what we call viruses? Is that the argument?
So what is the "something"? Again, how does this model fit the obvious questions?
Do these "poisons" multiply?
How are these "poison"s transmitted from person to person?
am confused. So how does the agent you are claiming cause disease different from the commonly accepted definition of a virus (or retrovirus)?
there is no contagion or self replicating anything