Mainstream Attack on Natural Health Intensifies

Ask questions, seek advice, or share your experience with vitamin C

Moderators: ofonorow, popnowlin

ofonorow
Ascorbate Wizard
Ascorbate Wizard
Posts: 15822
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Lisle, IL
Contact:

Mainstream Attack on Natural Health Intensifies

Post Number:#1  Post by ofonorow » Sun May 08, 2022 8:59 am

https://utopiasilver.com/mainstream-attack-on-natural-health-intensifies/

The suit was brought because of an emailed complaint from the FDA to the TDSHS demanding that we not be allowed to post customer testimonials and opinions about customer’s positive experiences with various supplements. We spent nine years fighting that lawsuit while being fined $25,000.00 per day. We eventually won this “Freedom of Speech” case when it was finally dropped and non-suited by the Texas Attorney General.

Over many decades our legal system has been increasingly rigged against Natural Healthcare companies, especially those who refuse to relinquish their Natural Rights to Healthcare Choice. In the current legal system our Rights will only be upheld by the judiciary if we “belligerently” defend them “in person” without representation of an attorney. This concept is set forth and defined in the infamous Judges guide manual, The Encyclopedia of American Jurisprudence II: The Belligerent Claimant: “The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.”
Owen R. Fonorow
HeartCURE.Info
American Scientist's Invention Could Prevent 350,000 Heart Bypass Operations a year

Return to “General Discussion Topics and Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests